Ask a starving man: Should that rich man feed you?-Yes of course
Ask a sick man: Should that doctor heal you?-Yes of course
Ask the dying: Should your relatives and community bury you?-That is my wish.
All of us expect our fellow human beings to help us when we are vulnerable. Whether you are a Anarcho-capitalist or not.
Human Rights are a reflection of our innate human need to be part of society. Codified Human Rights are a reflection of this need.
Human Right are innate to mankind.
I'd say you're just pointing out obvious biases. Human rights are not based on needs or material goods and services that we expect other people to provide to us. Rights are concepts about what we expect we should be free to act or do, and the only thing we need from other people is a recognition of our rights, and ask that they do not violate our rights.
How one should respond if/when rights are violated is the purpose of law and a legal system.
If we force a doctor to take care of a sick man, we are violating the doctor's rights. If he's not willing to voluntarily help sick people, then he's not much of a doctor. But even if he is, he still has expenses. Medicine and medical procedures cost money, i.e. take resources to provide. A doctor can sit at your bedside and try to comfort you, but if he can't give you medicine or operate on you when you need it, because the resources aren't available, he can't help you very much.
And that's just the doctor. There are similar problems with forcing people to 'help' the poor. Even burying a person takes a certain amount of resources, although it's not nearly as expensive or difficult as the other two.
What you seem to be saying is that no one has an economic right. Like-I don't have a right to say to a person: feed me I'm hungry and if you don't do your "duty" you are evil. Also, you seem to say that people have rights under law - I have no problem with that.
I said: Ask a starving man: Should that rich man feed you?-Yes of course
Ask a sick man: Should ...
But I see the point that my need and perceived right is subjective unless God is in the question.
I definitely don't want to be robbed by the needy; but I personally feel it is in my interest to give voluntarily.
Should then a government tax me - by force - to feed the hungry? It's an Interesting question.