Daily Anarchist Forum
August 15, 2022, 07:41:35 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Welcome to the Daily Anarchist Forum!
  Home Help Search Members Login Register  
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9]
121  General Category / Lounge / Star Wars or Star Trek on: July 18, 2012, 09:52:08 PM
Question: Which do you like better, Star Wars or Star Trek?
122  General Category / General Discussion / Re: A New Land on: July 17, 2012, 12:06:33 AM
To continue writing, now I will discuss the pros and cons of one of the other choices for settlement: Eiao and Hatutu islands.

-The approximate location of the islands are: 757'S , 14036'W
-The islands lie at the most northwestern point of the Marquesas Islands which is a part of French Polynesia.
-Both islands have a combined area of slightly less than twenty square miles.
-The island of Eiao has a natural harbor (Vaituha Bay).

Below is a map of the region and some pictures of the islands themselves:

Now, there are some disadvantages in choosing this island over others:
1) It is small. Eiao is only 16 square miles, with Hatutu being around 4 square miles. That is really small. For comparison, the island of Oahu (Honolulu), is almost 600 square miles.
2) According to wikipedia, in the late 19th century, the island was briefly used as a leper colony island, although that enterprise was eventually abandoned because of the frequent droughts. This is not cited, so who knows if it is true.
3) Since the island is small, there is a less likely chance that there is a large natural water supply on the island. As previously discussed, this could be overcome, but it would make settlement that much more difficult.

The advantages of this island over other choices include:
1) It's warm! The islands lie pretty close to the equator, so it is probably be easier to grow food on the island.
2) French Polynesia is not a large military power. However, France is so this point might be moot.
3) It is located in the center of the South Pacific, which would hopefully mean there would be more trade going on.

What do you guys think? What advantages/disadvantages do you guys see with this choice over the previous choice?

Also, if you think you found a great location, please feel free to share with the rest of us.
123  General Category / Lounge / Immortal Technique on: July 16, 2012, 11:30:03 PM
If you're a Immortal Technique fan, post your favorite song of his. My personal favorite would be Peruvian Cocaine.
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qBRXZNuK3Jo" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qBRXZNuK3Jo</a>
124  General Category / Lounge / Re: Ultimate Error Message Challenge. on: July 16, 2012, 06:52:13 PM
125  General Category / General Discussion / Re: A New Land on: July 16, 2012, 11:50:08 AM
It looks promising for now, however I don't want to fight a government to get it. I would rather just buy the island if possible. I don't think we could contest any governments claim to the island.

What do you think a government's response to such a situation be? If a hundred or more people all of a sudden, landed and started building houses and such on an uninhabited island, what would the government do?

I personally think it would go down like this:
-The government gets a report from fisherman of something going on, the government probably assume it is pirates, smugglers, or poachers. Of course, like all governments, it will take them at least three months to get around to doing anything about it, if they even do anything about it.
-The government would then probably send down an offshore patrol boat. This could be operated by either local police or navy.
-Once they gained sight of the settlement, they would first relay the information back to headquarters and probably wait for further orders.
-From there it is anyone's guess...they could send a landing party and try to talk with the settlers or they could open. They could turn on their PA system and demand that everyone vacate the island, which of course would be kindly responded with a big ole' 'fuck off!' But, who knows what they would do?

126  General Category / General Discussion / Re: A New Land on: July 15, 2012, 09:59:48 PM
A similar process would happen for me moving to a different country or remote island from New Hampshire.

So essentially what you are saying is that the only people would be willing to risk it all on this endeavor, would be those who were 'down on their luck' or 'who had nothing to lose'. That would leave me to conclude that poor and impoverished folk would be the most likely to join this quest.

If we look at the history of European settlement in the New World, the motivations for the immigrants either fall into one or more of the following categories: economic (ie: gold, fur, timber), religious, forced, and political. Economics tend to be the biggest motivation for immigration such as in the cases of the Conquistadors desire for gold and the Irish immigrants to America because of the Great Famine. Religious immigration tends to be a smaller motivation, with the two most prominent being the Mormon migration to the Western United States and the Pilgrims at Plymouth Rock. Forced immigration is one often overlooked. Throughout history, slaves have been used. This is caused large groups of people to be forced to move from their places of birth, such as in the cases of Nubian slaves throughout Egypt and the Thracians, and other groups, used by the Roman Empire.

And lastly there is political, which would be one of the motivating factors behind this idea. What are some historical examples of immigration that were primarily politically motivated? What lessons could be learned from them?
127  General Category / Lounge / Jimi Hendrix on: July 15, 2012, 07:20:13 PM
If you're a Hendrix fan, post your favorite song of his. My personal favorite would be Castles Made of Sand.
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WeQ5ovRVKoA" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WeQ5ovRVKoA</a>
128  General Category / General Discussion / Re: A New Land on: July 15, 2012, 01:21:57 PM
To fulfill the desire of some to have more specific information, here you go.

There are two possible locations for the establishment of what I call, "Freeland" or "Freeport". People from across the globe can come to this land. They can share and sell their goods and services, without any entity forcibly taking "their fair share" from them. This land is where the artist would not fear the censor, where the farmer would not fear the publican, where the trader would not fear the regulator, and where the citizen would not fear the government. It would be a place where a man would be able to keep all the fruits of his labor. A place where a man would be free and independent.

The first possible location would be at Auckland Islands:
-The archipelago has a combined area of 625 square kilometres (240 sq mi), making it the largest uninhabited, yet habitable, island in the world.
-It has a plethora of natural harbors and inlets.
-Due to these many inlets, this would allow the inhabitants to use small watercraft as the primary method of transportation, rather than automobiles which would require roads.
-Below is a topographical map of the Auckland Island archipelago:

-Below are some images of the ecology of the archipelago:


Now, as we all know, the three things humans need to survive are water, food, and shelter.
~Water should not be a problem on this island. While I have been unable to determine with one hundred percent accuracy if there is a natural fresh water source on the island, I would assume so due to the island's size. Also, if this assumption turned out to be incorrect, small scale desalination could be one of the many remedies. Others include rainwater collection and making distilled liquor. People have survived in the Sahara Desert, people can do it here.
~Food could prove to be a little more challenging. Since the climate on the archipelago is anything but cheery, settlers would have to get a little creative. The local wildlife (fish, seal, birds) could provide food for a short while, but the settlers would have to be cautious as not to wipe them out. I believe that agriculture could be done on this island, if larges scale greenhouses were used. The main difficulty with agriculture on this island, is the fact that on average, for 27 days per month, the sky is overcast. Nonetheless, I think agriculture would be possible using some creative techniques.
~Shelter should be fairly easy. There is a fairly large source of lumber on the islands themselves. Also, the initial settlers would be able to transport whatever they wanted, if they want they could transport building materials over with them.

Now, to discuss how the initial settlers would get over to their destination. A group of X number of individuals would form a voluntary association, meaning no one is forced to partake in this endeavor. From there, it would really be up to those members to decide how they want to proceed. I would personally advocate that each individual sells certain 'big-ticket' items such as their house and car. With that money they would then proceed to purchase a sea-worthy vessel to reach their destination. All the members could pitch in collectively and purchase a large vessel, or everyone could have their own smaller vessel. In any case, the vessel(s) would be loaded with anything the individual wanted to bring over, such as tools, food, power generation, firearms, etc.

Once the group of settlers make it over to the island, 'the world is their oyster' as the saying goes. I would build my house and maybe build a little restaurant. People could do whatever they wanted to, as long as it brought no harm to other individuals. You could build your own bar, or bakery, or shoe store, whatever you wanted.

Now, the main obstacle in this would be the New Zealand government. Since their is no habitable land on Earth that is unclaimed, this aspect of government interference would be a challenge no matter which island is chosen. How the government would react is unknown. They may just leave us alone in hopes that we all starve. They may send in a military occupation force. They may just drop a few bombs and kill us all. They may just park a few of their naval warships around our island, and try to starve our economy. Who knows until it happens?

I am going to stop writing for now. Please make suggestions. This idea is still in its very early stages and will need much work before it can actually be put into practice. If you are wondering what the other location was, it was Eiao and Hatutu Islands located in the French Polynesia.   
129  General Category / General Discussion / Re: A New Land on: July 15, 2012, 12:14:33 PM
It is one thing to risk it all, it is another to risk it all in a stupid manner.

I absolutely concur. The original question was just to gauge how the members of this forum felt about the prospect of actively building a voluntary society. The purpose of this question was to determine if the members here are men and women of action, or are simply "all bark and no bite" as the old saying goes.

130  General Category / General Discussion / Re: Guide to Astrology on: July 15, 2012, 12:10:18 PM
Are you serious?  Why spam this list?

So just because I post something that you deem nonsense, that makes it spam? Oh, my sovereign lord, please forgive my insolence and arrogance.  Roll Eyes 

What leads you to believe that we are incapable of going on (or off) line and researching this unscientific nonsense for ourselves if we wished to be 'educated'? 

I never once asserted that the members of this forum were unable to conduct research. I simply wish to spread knowledge. To be educated, one must not only study the topics which they agree with, but also the topics that they disagree with.

Do you have proof of this magical thinking?

No, I never once asserted that I did.
131  General Category / General Discussion / A New Land on: July 14, 2012, 11:18:24 PM

Question: Would you ever sell all of your possessions, buy a ship/aircraft and supplies, and sail/fly away to an uninhabited island with a group other people and attempt to establish a "new world"? Would you risk everything so that you could build a new world based upon your group's religious and/or philosophical and/or political ideology?

Nothing would be guaranteed. In fact, there would be a good chance you wouldn't make it, fail, and probably die. There would be a plethora of natural and man-made things all trying to ruin and kill you. You would only have what you would bring with you and what you could make for yourself, along with what the initial group of settlers could/would help you with. Your life would be completely in your hands. Would you risk it all in the attempt to establish a better world?
132  General Category / General Discussion / Guide to Astrology on: July 14, 2012, 11:08:51 PM
Title Page:

History of Astrology (Antiquity):

History of Astrology (Medieval):

The Celestial Sphere













Final Page

Note: This thread's sole purpose is to educate others about astrology and the concepts behind it. If you disagree with what astrology presents, then state your argument in an educated manner. The use of the images used this thread fall under the fair use doctrine for the purposes of education and research. Also, when replying to the thread, do not include the pictures used in the original post as it makes the thread difficult to load.
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines
SMFAds for Free Forums
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!