Agrarian_Agorist
The first half of your comment is an entire joke.
And respectable discourse goes out the window.
Are you and MAM able to understand the difference between government and non-government systems?
Derrr no we stoopid.
then how exactly is it in governments best interest to allow a Voluntaryist society to exist
No one claimed this.
That is a marvellous comparison. I suppose you may want to compare the hypothetical AnCapistan with Stalin's Russia.
A marvelous comparison that no one made. Communes were listed as a group that started an enclave that the government did not use force to destroy. Instead of accepting that fact, you just explain it away with your conspiracy theory.
Government will never oppose an organization which forces its residents/group to do things.
This is demonstrably historically overtly false. Gaddafi, Saddam, every government the US ever invaded forced people to do things.
I'm not sure how you think anything which you've used as a reply is even applicable.
You asked me why I don't think the state(US) is likely to actively resist this through force of arms. You also made the claim that "The US government only allows the different organizations exist which doesn't directly question it's(the US government's) power and authority"
I then listed examples of events and organizations that were many orders of magnitudes more serious that a random colony being founded somewhere. I listed examples where US laws were broken, and the US's power was overtly challenged and yet nothing was done. That is why they are applicable.
You say that they need an excuse to intervene militarily; are you serious? They can make-up any excuse and the Propaganda Ministry aka the MSM will push it; it is not like actual proof of anything is required.
You realize making up an excuse is still an excuse. I never said I believe them. I indicated that it would be a hard sell to say we were massacring people or developing WMDs in a small colony.
Why would Hong Kong have been bombed by now?
You claimed that a ancap colony would prove to the world that anarchy works AND that this would somehow threaten state power as the masses open their eyes to the truth that they can live w/o government.
My point was, if this was the case, then they should all be agitating for smaller government since it has been proven to be successful. Even Keynseins admit lower tax rates increase business activity and often lead to higher government revenue.
According to your logic, a smaller government being successful anywhere would then threaten the power of larger governments, and thus, they should be instantly attacked and destroyed so that there's no examples of small governments being successful.
Now lets look at some conspiracy fueled trolling on your part.
If you think people aren't complaining about the tax system, then you certainly aren't paying attention. However, when even when the people do agree, the politicians wont vote for it anyway. But, the voice gets louder and louder and louder. If you think people like the IRS or paying taxes; then you must be very young, because I don't know anybody who likes paying taxes. If their was a system which could be shown to actually work, then it would be a threat.
I don't remember even remotely hinting at any of this
While you think there would be a low probability for the US government -or any government- to take action against your Anarchist enclave
I don't see how you could have read the article I linked, or the responses I gave, and concluded that I think that there's a low probability of ANY GOVERNMENT attacking. I again and again have said, you need to be able to fight a 3rd world type army and deter a first world army.
Furthermore, I conceded that there might be meddling and that that meddling would have to be dealt with.
Really, you are going to play Waco was molesting children and had automatic weapons? That is your justification; you certainly sound like a state worshipper to me. The facts after the incident proved that neither were they molesting children nor did they have illegal weapons. So, support your state actions some-more.
Maybe you didn't see that part where I said I don't know if those things are true. Devolving into Ad hominem also,nice touch, very classy.
You talk about Washington and Colorado; do you remember when California legalized MMJ? What did the Feds do? If you think that Washington and Colorado are even close to being off-the-hook you are seriously delusional;
According to
http://norml.org/legal/medical-marijuana-2 about 18 states have legal marijuanna.
Where are the Black Fema helicopters and the storm troopers?
Government will tolerate government
Except when they invade or destroy them, of coarse. Or maybe its all part of their master plan.
leading to a one world socialistic government
given the ability to operate due to the CIA selling them drugs
while this is true, all 200+ countries have governments and either have a central bank tied to the Central Banking Cabal or are so heavily vested in Euros or Dollars, that those countries are more like vassal states than independent countries.
This one takes the cake
You may think that they are not all knowing , but that is funny. Have you never heard of their Eye in the Sky, have you never heard about their facility in Utah? Have you never heard about all electronic financial transactions being monitored. Everything in the US in now monitored; how exactly is that not all knowing?
HAAHAHAHA OK, they are all knowing let me get my tinfoil hat.
So let me get this straight, you called me a "state worshiper", and that I should "support state actions some more", none of which I did.
Meanwhile... you think the Government is all powerful AND all knowing.
So somehow I am a state worshiper supporter of government action who thinks the state can be defeated and is not all knowing.
It is now obvious to me you are either a statist troll or a conspiracy nut (maybe both) I will not respond to any more of your posts unless you 1. apologize for your ad hom nonsense and 2. address the topics at hand without flying off the handle.
Show Posts
