Daily Anarchist Forum

General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: James Redford on June 09, 2018, 07:06:52 PM

Title: Entheogenica Esoterica
Post by: James Redford on June 09, 2018, 07:06:52 PM
The typical trip:

* "The STOP", Jim Cummings ( vimeo.com/jimmycthatsme ), May 27, 2018, https://vimeo.com/272139075 . Mirrors: Danny-Madden-The-STOP.mp4 , 68805634 bytes, MD5: cb2d5e040fcb7aaea9569ceff7ab7599, https://mirrorcreator.com/files/UPW9GRUH/ , https://openload.co/f/_Vz1W29806U/ , https://bit.ly/2Hz0mYk . Directed by Danny Madden; written by Danny Madden, Jim Cummings and Dustin Hahn. From the television miniseries Minutes (prod. co.: Vanishing Angle; distr.: Fullscreen, Inc., Jan. 2017), also entitled The Minutes Collection.

* * * * *

Exoterica Esoterica

However, we speak wisdom among those who are mature, yet not the wisdom of this age, nor of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing. But we speak the wisdom of God in a mystery, the hidden wisdom which God ordained before the ages for our glory, which none of the rulers of this age knew; for had they known, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.


But each one in his own order: Christ the firstfruits, afterward those who are Christ's at His coming. Then comes the end, when He delivers the kingdom to God the Father, when He puts an end to all rule and all authority and power.

From Paul, 1 Corinthians 2:6-8 and 15:23,24, New King James Version.


* James Redford, "The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of Everything", Social Science Research Network (SSRN), Sept. 10, 2012 (orig. pub. Dec. 19, 2011), 186 pp., doi:10.2139/ssrn.1974708, https://archive.org/download/ThePhysicsOfGodAndTheQuantumGravityTheoryOfEverything/Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf , https://purl.org/redford/physics-of-god , https://sites.google.com/site/physicotheism/home/Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf .

* James Redford, "Video of Profs. Frank Tipler and Lawrence Krauss's Debate at Caltech: Can Physics Prove God and Christianity?", alt.sci.astro, Message-ID: jghev8tcbv02b6vn3uiq8jmelp7jijluqk@4ax.com , July 30, 2013, https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.sci.astro/KQWt4KcpMVo (https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.sci.astro/KQWt4KcpMVo) , https://archive.is/a04w9 , https://webcitation.org/6IUTAMEyS .

* James Redford, "Jesus Is an Anarchist", Social Science Research Network (SSRN), Dec. 4, 2011 (orig. pub. Dec. 19, 2001), 60 pp., doi:10.2139/ssrn.1337761, https://archive.org/download/JesusIsAnAnarchist/Redford-Jesus-Is-an-Anarchist.pdf , http://theophysics.host56.com/anarchist-jesus.pdf , https://jamesredford.github.io/Redford-Jesus-Is-an-Anarchist.pdf .

* James Redford, "Libertarian Anarchism Is Apodictically Correct", Social Science Research Network (SSRN), Dec. 15, 2011, 9 pp., doi:10.2139/ssrn.1972733, https://archive.org/download/LibertarianAnarchismIsApodicticallyCorrect/Redford-Apodictic-Libertarianism.pdf , https://jamesredford.github.io/Redford-Apodictic-Libertarianism.pdf , http://theophysics.freevar.com/Redford-Apodictic-Libertarianism.pdf .

* James Redford, "Societal Sadomasochism", Daily Anarchist Forum, May 29, 2018, https://megalodon.jp/2018-0610-0734-14/dailyanarchist.com/forum/index.php?topic=3289.0 , https://archive.is/QalJT , https://web.archive.org/web/20180609221637/https://dailyanarchist.com/forum/index.php?topic=3289.0 .

Title: Re: Entheogenica Esoterica
Post by: macsnafu on July 11, 2018, 11:23:38 AM
I'm not sure referencing *yourself* counts as a legitimate reference.  Obviously, if you want people to refer to your other work, a link is necessary, but that doesn't make it a "reference".

Title: Re: Entheogenica Esoterica
Post by: James Redford on July 11, 2018, 11:18:16 PM
I'm not sure referencing *yourself* counts as a legitimate reference.  Obviously, if you want people to refer to your other work, a link is necessary, but that doesn't make it a "reference".

You spoke the truth in your first sentence: you are unsure because you have not the slightest clue as to what you are talking about regarding this matter which obviously upset you and caused you to behave irrationally and ignorantly. Nor did I call them "reference[s)", despite your false quotes.

However, even though your imaginary phantom event never occurred, that nevertheless is just the standard Scholarly Method: it's just standard for scholarly and academic writers to cite their own works when said cited works address an issue pertaining to a matter under discussion. What your objection really consists of is epistemological relativism. You just plain don't like what I write about, and hence don't like me citing my own works, even though that is standard.

If some day you wish to get over your irrationality and ignorance, my above articles are the best for that.