MaoistRebelNews is onto us

[Twilight Sparkle]

So a while back I posted a video by MaoistRebelNews in the "Other Videos" section where he read off a piece by Ernest Mandel in regards to Competition, Capitalism and wealth concentration. Anyway I asserted the notion that monopolies in the 19th century were aided by government and somehow he stumbled across that post and has gone and made a video on it. Obviously I missed the part where he was reading from An Introduction To Marxist Economic Thought and thought it was one of his arguments, It was my bad.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=gU4bAfKn2_I

Anyway he accuses me of resorting to Ad hominem arguments and the such, Goes on to say that were Not Anarchists and says that I didn't make an argument. Although I am Interested in knowing how he stumbled across this website

[State-God]

Maoist can go fuck himself. He completely ignored your post and made it seem as though MAM was the original poster.

[MAM]

Maoist can go fuck himself. He completely ignored your post and made it seem as though MAM was the original poster.

+1 also I posted on his video if you like you can go read what I said. My you tube alias that I posted under is mrhnm

[RJ Miller]

It does not appear that this guy has a strong enough following for it to be worth critiquing him at this point.

And please, no one here needs to draw attention to this oasis we call the DA forums. 

[Tear-Down-the-Wall]

Either he has extremely, extremely, extremely thin skin or he's trying to pick a fight with us ancaps.

It's not like you wrote a book critiquing him and it's not like MAM called him a child serial rapist. For him to go through all that trouble to make a YouTube video on something so small and insignificant, not to belittle your post, shows me his vagina bleeds easily or he's looking for a fight.

His argument falls apart at the beginning and I stopped watching when he said we're not anarchist. He's not the intellectual superhero he thinks he is and he should stop before be really starts to spill fuckdumb all over the place.

Oxford Dictionary is THE dictionary of the English language. What is anarchy?

Definition of anarchy
noun
[mass noun]
1a state of disorder due to absence or non-recognition of authority or other controlling systems:
he must ensure public order in a country threatened with anarchy
2absence of government and absolute freedom of the individual, regarded as a political ideal.
Origin:

mid 16th century: via medieval Latin from Greek anarkhia, from anarkhos, from an- 'without' + arkhos 'chief, ruler'


Anarcho-Capitalist are anarchist and at its heart it's a libertarian idea. I see nothing in there about property rights or private wealth. Anarchy is simply the absence of the state.

What's really funny is a bunch of folks who masturbate to Mao Zedong's photo when they wake up in the morning are lecturing us, or trying to, about what an anarchist is.

I mean China is the perfect example of an anarchist society if you take away the massive censorship, the genocides, forced abortions, the Nazi like nationalism, and the fact they'll run you over with a tank if you question the status quo but let's not let facts and history books get in the way of a perfectly flawed political philosophy.

TL;DR
Statist gonna state.

[helio]

Yeah, I would just forget about this and focus on actions that will yield positive results.  What is that the bible says about throwing pearls to swine?